Venu Govindaraju, Distinguished Professor, Chief AI Officer, and Senior Vice President for Research, Innovation and Economic Development at SUNY Buffalo, calls the oral examination “the gold standard of evaluation and assessment” in academic life, as in a doctoral candidate’s dissertation defense. He envisions oral examinations at all levels in university life. And AI, he says, will be able do it. From the Inside Higher Ed podcast The Key , “AI for the Public Good with Govindaraju”:
So all those aspects can a simulated by a AI platform. We could actually have AI platforms simulate the AI committee, ... and this would this scale.... I'm sure in the future we will be able to scale individualized oral exams.... When you come and take an exam, you know, we will have our own AI platform which will engage with you just like a committee engages a Ph.D. student.Govindaraju envisions AI as making the university “a super marvellous place which will enrich the learning process in ways that we never imagined before.”
The interviewer’s response: “Mmm.”
But it’s not clear what instructors are supposed to do until AI takes over exams. Nor is it clear whether Govindaraju envisions AI replacing a doctoral candidate’s committee — and if not, why not. But even if not, his is still a remarkable proposal: AI makes it impossible to determine what a student knows by administering, say, a written test; therefore, we should use AI to determine by other means what a student knows. And the result will enable “us” to “look at the trajectory of inquisition of the student.” But it’s not clear who will be looking, nor is it clear how that would scale.
To adapt Alex Hirsch’s response to Sam Altman: Why not just talk to your students?
See also a post I wrote during the mania for MOOCs: The gold standard, haircuts, and everyone else. An excerpt:
An often-repeated claim among those who insist on educational disruption is that the efficiencies of teaching — one teacher, one room — have stayed the same for too long. But then the efficiencies of, say, cutting hair — one barber, one head — haven’t changed much either. Perhaps there are good reasons why. The great irony for me in the rhetoric of disruption: those who speak it will no doubt seek for their own children what [John] Hennessy [then-president of Standford] calls “the gold standard.” There will always be real college for the few. For everyone else, it may be another story.Related reading
All OCA AI posts (Pinboard)
[But also: the AI panel would have to make sure that the students are not ghosts. Maybe facial recognition would help — something Govindaraju worked on years ago.]


