Thursday, June 23, 2022

Supreme inconsistency


Cross my heart — this is exactly the point I made about three hours ago as Elaine and I were pulling into a Walgreen’s parking lot.

[I call anticipatory plagiarism.]

comments: 2

Pete said...

Their argument is that abortion isn’t a specifically identified right in the Constitution, while gun possession is. Of course, there’s no consensus over what the 2nd Amendment actually means. So, in that definitional void, the majority defines it however they damned well please, to the detriment of all of us.

Michael Leddy said...

It’s awful. My mindless representative in Congress just repeats “shall not be abridged,” with no consideration for the rest of the sentence, or what “arms” might denote, or what it means to “bear” them.