Friday, April 7, 2023

Friends blogging, blogging friends

Fresca improved a paragraph by Adam Gopnik. Boy did she ever.

Slywy found an abandoned general store, and its history.

comments: 12

shallnot said...

I’m not too sure about changing Gopnik’s “humming self-confidence” to just plain “self-confidence”. This seems to be something from the kill all adverbs and adjectives school. Not all self-confidences are the same: quiet, humming, unexpected, et cetera.

Here’s a thought: is “I heart ❤️ it” some sort of tautology or wrong wording as ❤️ is a substitute for “love” (at least in the original “I ❤️ NY” advertising campaign)?

Here’s another thought: how many examples of “Muphry’s Law” [sic] have I committed in this comment?

Steven

Michael Leddy said...

I don’t use heart in that way, but Merriam-Webster does have it as a verb. Do you mean using both the emoji and the word, one after the other? I’m not sure why someone would do that.

The things that most struck me in Gopnik’s paragraph: the use of is in sentence after sentence and the pile of prepositional phrases. A perfect candidate for Richard Lanham’s paramedic method for revising prose. Since everything in that passage is about steady, ongoing well-being, humming seems a little affected to me. Maybe Fresca (who has comments turned off) will weigh in here on the word.

shallnot said...

I believe that the whole “I heart…” pattern and dictionary inclusion as a verb stems from the release of the movie "I ♥ Huckabees” (2004). Theatres marquees (remmeber marquees?) and print sources that lacked the heart character (emojis weren’t that common) needed a way to represent the titular ♥ so they went for the literal “heart” giving “I Heart Huckabees". I guess that there were enough people who didn’t remember the 1977 NY ad campaign so they didn’t use “Love".

My observation was that “I heart ♥ it” could be read as “I heart heart it”. But, it should be read as “I heart love it”.

Michael Leddy said...

Ah, now I get it. I think it’s odd to use the heart and the word both. Maybe the emoji is supposed to be for clarity?

Fresca said...

Oh, yeah—I cut “humming” because it’s specific, too specific in this case.
I mean, did Gopnik really mean to say that embellishments reflect onlyhumming self-confidence? Seems unlikely, and weird if he did mean that.

I got in the habit of using both an emoji and the related word (❤️ and “love” or “heart”)
because on low-tech devices like flip phones (a dear friend has a flip phone),
emojis don’t always show up as themselves—sometimes they’re just a square or something.
I figure people can figure out what I mean if both the word and the emoji.

Fresca said...

PS Michael, you might know— what’s the name of the empty/broken box that appears when your tech doesn’t support an emoji?
I went looking for a name and found “tofu”. I guess the blank box looks like a block of plain tofu!
I like it—it expresses an emotional blank as well:
I’ve been frustrated when a writer counts on me seeing their emoji to understand their mood,
and I get tofu instead.

Fresca said...

PPS I used the heart emoji because I was thinking of “ I ❤️NY”, designed, as you know, by Glaser,the subject of Gopnik’s article. I don’t usually use emojis in a blog post, but I use them a lot in texts (which is why I’m aware they don’t always show up).

Fresca said...

And finally—thanks for asking, shallnot and Michael. Fun question!

Michael Leddy said...

Aha — so it is for clarity. Thank you, Fresca.

I’ve had a number of fails using emoji in texts to non-iOS users. But I've never seen an empty box on my end, and I didn’t know that it was called tofu. I now see that there’s an app called Tofu Destroyer for displaying emoji properly on Android devices.

Fresca said...

Yes, you were right, Michael—the ❤️/heart was for clarity.

Fresca said...

And one more note from me, to say I enjoyed seeing Slywy's post about the abandoned general store---thanks for the roundup, Michael!

Michael Leddy said...

You’re most welcome, Fresca.