On “the preeminence of ABC.” From Judith Flanders’s A Place for Everything: The Curious History of Alphabetical Order (New York: Basic Books, 2020):
It is an unspoken assumption of alphabetic writing systems that the alphabet is primary. Letters near the beginning of the alphabet are somehow superior to those that follow: alpha males dominate romantic fiction; in the 1950s, B-movies followed or preceded the main feature; in the 1960s the B-side of records carried the songs that were not expected to be hits. The preeminence of ABC over, say, DEF, or LMN, runs unconsciously through every part of the world that uses an alphabet, and some regions that do not: there have been broadcasting companies named ABC in the USA, Australia, Britain, the Philippines, and even in Japan, a nonalphabet country; it is also the title of a Swedish news program, a Spanish newspaper, and several food companies and cinema chains across the globe. As well as an Arab Banking Corporation in alphabetic Bahrain, there is an Agricultural Bank of China in decidedly nonalphabetic China. ABC is a programming language, and a streaming algorithm. English-speakers learning first aid are reminded to check ABCs (airways, breathing, circulation). Mathematics has an abc conjecture, an ABC formula, and Approximate Bayesian Computation. The Admiralty, Baranof, and Chichagof Islands off the coast of Alaska are known as the ABC Islands; their counterparts in the Lesser Antilles are Aruba, Bonaire, and Curaçao.I’m still in the preface and already learning things.
comments: 5
Though to be strictly accurate, ABC is a barely known and largely unused programming language that in all my professional IT life I never used once! Appearing over 30 years ago, it was intended to replace BASIC but is decidedly a historical curiosity. Programming languages have all kinds of fun and exotic names, but the best known ones (C, Java, Python, NodeJS, R, and going back a bit FORTRAN, COBOL and Pascal) don't have any obvious alphabetic preeminence.
But including it in the list gives, perhaps, a semblance of technological support to the argument!
I'm recalling those odd attempts to be listed first in the telephone directory, as if some strange bragging right was conferred...
AAAAAAAA Auto Repair
Aardvark Consulting
etc.
I guess she was going for exhaustive. I know nothing about programming, but I’ve always liked the name C because of Wallace Stevens’s “The Comedian as the Letter C” and Ted Berrigan’s little magazine C, named after the poem.
Those front-of-the-book listings are AAAAAlways Reliable, aren’t they?
In fact I had a thought today while painting a room in readiness for guests returning in numbers on May 17th... it would have been (IMHO) a far more convincing mathematical argument, presupposing that she felt the need for one, to note that x, y, z at the end of the alphabet are routinely used to represent unknown quantities, whereas a, b, c at the start are almost never used for this, unless as abbreviations for a specific known item (such as a for area).
So one might conceivably argue that the act of pushing the unknowns to the end implicitly prioritises a, b, c as being important.
Maybe something like that is still to come. I’ve yet to hit the pages with Arabic numerals.
Post a Comment