Friday, September 16, 2016

Fritzi’s whom


[Nancy , September 16, 1949.]

You’re right, Fritzi Ritz: whom . Today’s yesterday’s Nancy teaches us that there is no conflict between good usage and good cartooning.

Related reading
All OCA Nancy posts (Pinboard)

[This post is tongue-in-cheek: I’d say who . Wouldn’t you?]

6 comments:

  1. Half the time I probably would say 'to whom were you speaking', though I would say 'who was that on the phone?'

    Always liked Aunt Fritzi.

    ReplyDelete
  2. “Who was that on the phone?” is pretty usual in our house. Too often it’s Rachel-from-cardholder-services or some other fake. You can’t tell from this panel, but Nancy really was talking to nobody (practicing for a party).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, "who called?"
    I don't think I (ever?) use "whom" in speech, only in writing (sometimes).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Knock knock.
    Who's there?
    To.
    To who?
    To whom.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Glad you liked it! I heard that on a podcast recently and everyone I tell it to loves it. Such a simple twist on that old chestnut, I'm surprised I hadn't heard it when I was a kid.

    ReplyDelete

Play fair. Keep it clean. No potshots and no derailing. Thanks.

I moderate to keep out spam. Comments won’t appear at once, but they don’t disappear, so there’s no need to post a comment more than once.