[Nancy, March 29, 1950. Click for a larger view.]
Today’s yesterday’s Nancy is a some-fest. Let ’s look:
First panel: some rocks, some more rocks, some trees.
Second panel: some fence posts.
Third panel: some tires, some trailer windows, some curved lines (above the mop).
The strip itself: some Nancys in some panels.
What is the collective name for somes? It’s school, which I just made up. Here is another school of somes, this one found in east-central Illinois.
Related reading
All OCA Nancy posts (Pinboard)
[“Some rocks” are an abiding preoccupation of these pages.]
Thursday, January 2, 2020
A school of somes
By Michael Leddy at 8:19 AM comments: 0
Don Larsen (1929–2020)
“Larsen often said that a day didn’t go by when he did not think about his feat, and he drove a car with the license plate DL000, for his initials and the box score reading no runs, no hits and no errors”: from the New York Times obituary. I’ve known Don Larsen’s name since boyhood.
[Note to self: I have to get used to typing 2020.]
By Michael Leddy at 8:09 AM comments: 0
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Holiday wars
Have you noticed that people are saying “Happy New Year” again?
By Michael Leddy at 6:04 PM comments: 0
The days of my PDF
Like sands through the hourglass, so are the days of our lives, and of my PDF. Available via Dropbox, it’s a calendar for 2020, three months per page, all Gill Sans, with markings for New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Saint Patrick’s Day, Halloween, Thanksgiving, and Christmas. Highly readable, even across a room. Maybe two rooms if they’re small.
[Just a second post to share this calendar. If not now, when?]
By Michael Leddy at 8:25 AM comments: 1
Tuesday, December 31, 2019
New Year’s Eve 1919
[“Hotels Anticipate Wet New Year Eve. They Prepare for an Old-Fashioned Celebration on a Generous Scale.” The New York Times, December 28, 1919.]
Prohibition in 1919? Yes. The Wartime Prohibition Act, meant to conserve grain, was passed on November 18, 1918, after the signing of the armistice. (An official end to the Great War was yet to come.) The act, which prohibited the sale of beverages with more than 1.28% alcohol (2.56 proof), went into effect on June 30, 1919. Two subheadlines from the Times article give an idea of what was to happen on the first dry New Year’s Eve: “To Invade Secret Caches,” and “Guests Will Take Their Liquors to Private Dining Rooms, for Which There Is Great Demand.” The Times reported that at one Manhattan hotel, “the flask party would be the most popular indoor sport.”
Brief items in the January 1, 1920 Times give an idea of what went on in other parts of the country. In Boston, “greater abandon of merrymaking.” In Philadelphia, “unlimited quantities of any drink ever seen here.” In Cincinnati, a “decidedly ‘wet’ celebration,” with the hip flask “much in abundance.” In Chicago, “large crowds who drank in wild revel,” aided by a legal ruling that provided a loophole for those drinking “on the hip.” In Milwaukee, where “beer cellars were depleted long ago,” champagne sold for $25 a quart. In New Orleans, restaurant customers “armed with their own liquor.” In St. Louis, “a wild night,” “with whisky in the lead.” And in Omaha, no cocktails, just “whiskey, brandy, gin, wine, home-brew stuffs and soft drinks.”
But in St. Paul, “little evidence of old-time frivolity.” Denver was “a drab affair.” San Francisco “found itself groping around in the gloom of a spiritless night.” And in Seattle, “less liquid cheer” than “at a Pilgrim Father’s barn raising.”
May 2020 be a year with greater reason for hope on Spaceship Earth. Happy New Year to all.
[Were those who drank from hip flasks hip? There appears to be no connection.]
By Michael Leddy at 1:10 PM comments: 4
Domestic comedy
[Too much Hallmark.]
“Is Kringlefest one word or two?”
Related reading
All OCA domestic comedy posts (Pinboard)
[I guess my typing decided it. But should it be camel-cased?]
By Michael Leddy at 8:33 AM comments: 2
Monday, December 30, 2019
“Not part of my portfolio”
“Immigration is not part of my portfolio, obviously”: uh-huh. She’s complicit.
By Michael Leddy at 1:32 PM comments: 2
“Each morning”
Stefan Zweig, writing in 1937 about the Jews’ Temporary Shelter, a London charitable institution that provided housing and meals to Jewish refugees:
Each morning the paper barks in your face wars, murders and crimes, the madness of politics clutters our senses, but the good that happens quietly unnoticed, of that we are scarcely aware. Such things are all the more crucial in an epoch like ours, for all ethical labour by its example wakens in us truly precious energies, and each man becomes the better when he is capable of admiring with sincerity that which is inherently good.I’m reminded of the advice Fred Rogers said his mother gave him when he was a boy: “Always look for the helpers.”
“The House of a Thousand Fortunes,” in Journeys , trans. Will Stone (London: Hesperus Press, 2011).
By Michael Leddy at 8:17 AM comments: 1
Sunday, December 29, 2019
Word of the day: lackadaisical
I always thought that lackadaisical suggested slackerly indifference. Merriam-Webster agrees, saying that the word “implies a carefree indifference marked by half-hearted efforts.” And lo, M-W gives this example: “lackadaisical college seniors pretending to study.”
But wait — there’s more. The Oxford English Dictionary gives this sole definition:
Resembling one who is given to crying “Lackaday!”; full of vapid feeling or sentiment; affectedly languishing. Said of persons, their behaviour, manners, and utterances.The word comes from the interjection lackadaisy, with the suffixes -ic and -al added. The OED identifies lackadaisy as an extended form of lack-a-day, which itself is an shortened form of alackaday,
used to express grief, concern, or regret at the events of a particular day; (later more generally) used to express surprise or dismay about a current situation.Alack the day is another way of putting it.
A choice citation, from The Tender Husband (1705), a play by Richard Steele:
Alack a day, Cousin Biddy, these Idle Romances have quite turn’d your Head.To care and not to care: it seems that lackadaisical points in both directions. I am not lackadaisical about that. Nor am I lackadaisical about that.
By Michael Leddy at 8:37 AM comments: 2
Saturday, December 28, 2019
Today’s Saturday Stumper
Today’s Newsday Saturday Stumper is another Lester Ruff (that is, easier) puzzle, but it proved pretty difficult for me. Many of the clues seemed to lead in no particular direction. 1-A, seven letters, “Seafood serving.” Or 47-A, six letters, “Seafood serving.” Such clues left me at sea. I had better luck with another food group: 18-A, seven letters, “Pesto tidbit.” That answer helped me work out the puzzle’s northeast corner in very little time. Everything else took much longer.
Some clues of interest:
1-D, seven letters, “Type of paint.” Pairs nicely with 1-A.
15-A, seven letters, “Annoyed.” The answer is pretty awkward.
20-A, three letters, “Something owed.” This clue continues a minor trend in Saturday Stumper clueing.
40-D, seven letters, “Land lady.” Nice.
41-D, three letters, “Ports, for instance.” Very nice.
44-D, seven letters, “Quarters with buttons.” I took a wild guess that turned out to be right.
49-A, seven letters, “Horsefeathers.” Good fun to see the answer.
62-A, seven letters, “‘. . . the Flying Trapeze’ guy.” I had no idea how the clue and answer go together. But they do.
No spoilers: the answers are in the comments.
By Michael Leddy at 7:32 AM comments: 1