From Joe Klein, writing for Time:
On the Friday before her resurrection, Hillary Clinton seemed exhausted, played out.Yes, resurrection can mean "resurgence, revivial"; it need not refer to the dead rising. But the paragraph in which this sentence appears describes the "funereal" mood on a Clinton campaign plane, which strongly suggests the primary meaning of resurrection, whatever the writer's intent. So the metaphor fails: if the mood is "funereal" and there's a resurrection to come, you're dead, not "exhausted, played out."
But worse: for a thinking reader, theist or non-theist, there's something grotesque in the very idea of a sentence about the Friday before a politician's resurrection.
As the sign said, THINK.
Related posts
CNN and mixed metaphors
Everything but the kitchen sink
The Elements of Style
Mixed metaphors
Myth and mixed metaphors
Of prongs and pillars
Times reporter on metaphorical spree
comments: 3
I disagree. A deliberate play on Good Friday (funereal mood) is not mixing metaphors - and why not, anyway, when it works? - but layering them (dead/exhausted) by use of multiple meanings, something I'm quite fond of trying.
I didn't say it's mixing metaphors, but I do think it's an inept metaphor. My intuition is that Klein wasn't thinking about the Good Friday overtone — thus my link to the IBM sign. His sentence is, for me, an example of what happens when a writer relies upon tired phrases instead of thought. In the same piece, Klein has Barack Obama developing fissures in his armor while jabbing and volleying. An armored boxer? A boxing tennis player?
Writing that really pursues the implications of a metaphor is something quite different, I'd say.
Yes, I apologise, my mistake about mixing metaphors; I thought that was what you were implying. Of course a 'resurrection phrase' is rather tired: no argument with you there!
Post a Comment