In The New York Times : “Philosophers (and Welders) React to Marco Rubio’s Debate Comments.”
My reaction: Characterizing philosophy as an odd, antiquated endeavor, something for practical people to avoid, will do nothing to endanger the discipline at elite schools. Rubio’s remarks are one more gesture toward recasting non-elite education as vocational training. I will quote myself (again):
If powerful and moneyed interests now seeking to reshape higher education have their way, “college” will soon become a two-tier system, with the real thing for a privileged few . . . and credits and credentials, haphazardly assembled, vocationally themed, for everyone else.As the son of a tile man, I have great respect for all trades and those who ply them. But I also believe in the value of studying philosophy. By the way, it wasn’t that long ago (1999) that a presidential candidate could be asked to name a favorite philosopher. “Jesus Christ,” George W. Bush famously replied.
A related post
“Rich kids” and English
[If you’re Matthew Crawford, quoted in the Times piece, you can both philosophize and weld.]