To meddle in an election? There must be a word that better captures the enormity.
Merriam-Webster’s definition of meddle: “to interest oneself in what is not one’s concern : interfere without right or propriety.” M-W gives a sample sentence from George Bernard Shaw: “I never meddle in other people’s private affairs.”
From Webster’s Second, a more eloquent definition: “to interest, engage, or concern oneself unnecessarily or impertinently; to interfere improperly.” And from a W2 note on meddle and related words: “To meddle (with or in) is to concern oneself officiously or impertinently with another’s affairs.”
Notice: to interest oneself in what is not one’s concern; to concern oneself officiously or impertinently with another’s affairs. Meddle suggests individual interference in another person’s life. To meddle is to be a buttinsky or a Nosey Parker, to plant doubts, to offer unsolicited advice, to ask questions to which the only proper response is None of your B.I. bizness! To engage in a well-funded operation to sow national discord and sway an election: that goes well beyond meddling.
More appropriate words: to interfere in an election, to subvert democracy. “Russian meddling” is too trivial a description of what’s gone on. I’m going to avoid using it.
I don’t know what B.I. stands for either. But that’s what we said in Brooklyn.
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Needed: a word other than meddle
By Michael Leddy at 3:49 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
comments: 2
This reminds me of how Emma Thompson said the old euphemism for "sexual abuse" was "bothered," as in an older woman asking a younger,
"Meddle" does seem too mild, but then, there's also, Will no one rid me of the meddlesome priest?
I didn’t know the Emma Thompson observation. Thanks for that.
Yes, there is meddlesome, which is about the state, but also a matter of the personal, no? One king, one priest.
Post a Comment