Ending a sentence with it Now with a 1795 source for the ill-considered prohibition on sentence-ending it .
Don’t look for premiums or
coupons, as the cost of
the thoughts blended in
ORANGE CRATE ART pro-
hibits the use of them.
Comments are welcome, appended to posts or by e-mail.
View Profile
Search this blog
Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
StatCounter
Subscribe
Top twenty tags
Words to live by
#1 hit
In memory of
Blog Archive
favorite posts
- Against “deep reading”
- Alkalize with Alka-Seltzer
- At the World Trade Center and St. Paul’s Chapel
- Being wrong about beauty
- Bobbing for apples
- “Bon Appétit!”
- “The ’Clipse”
- Couric and Palin and Orwell
- Digital naïfs
- Donald Trump’s spelling
- Ellington for beginners
- “Extra credit?”
- Five desks
- Five pens
- Fluke life
- The gold standard, haircuts, and everyone else
- Happy birthday, Mr. Piletti
- Hoagies, pizza, and English studies
- Homeric blindness in “colledge”
- How to Write a Sentence
- Imaginary liner notes
- Invisible man: Louis Armstrong and the New York Times
- Invitation to a dance
- John Lee Hooker and Canned Heat
- Is there a pencil in The House?
- A Kerouac notebook page
- The kitchen shink [sic]
- Klenosky!
- Lady Elaine’s can
- “Make My Jotter Quit!”
- Mysteries of the tollbooth
- National’s et cetera
- Nick DeMaio and the Eldorado
- Obama revisions
- Obama thoughts
- On “On the New Literacy”
- “On the Road”
- The other little book
- Out of the past
- “The Poet”
- Phones Are For People
- Politics and theory
- Proust: involuntary memory, foolish things
- P.S. 131
- Pullum on Strunk and White
- Re: the Beloit Mindset List
- Some have gone and some remain
- Sports Illustrated and Proust
- The Springfield Daily Gazette
- That (in)famous line
- W(h)ither grammar
- Van Dyke Parks in Chicago
Nancy, October 19, 1950.
comments: 0
Post a Comment