tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8343608.post7385336988049765739..comments2024-03-28T20:53:54.312-05:00Comments on Orange Crate Art: Soy milk, New York Times, and WikipediaMichael Leddyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05547732736861224886noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8343608.post-69998966882244225212007-03-31T08:38:00.000-05:002007-03-31T08:38:00.000-05:00Some follow up to report: as of sometime early thi...Some follow up to report: as of sometime early this morning, the Times article now includes a formal notice of correction...but no clear acknowledgment of the delay between the article changes and the correction text. This certaionly completes the process of addressing our original concerns about the article, but I'm not sure it truly provides resolution this late in the game. As I wrote in Wikipedia:<BR/><BR/>On a side note: this seems to be turning into a story about journalist ethics, which is interesting to me. Our original concerns about the story, IMHO, seemed to point to the panel recommendations, not to the reporter, as being responsible for reporting outdated information. It is only since the article was emended silently, with no accompanying correction or acknowledgement, that the Times' journalism has been called into question. One might say that this wasn't about the Times, until the Times made it about themselves. Unfortunately for them, as the BoingBoing acceptance may suggest, in a world where blogger-journalists pass discovery around like lightning, the Times may be a juicer target than a study about the nutritional applications of beverages, no matter how popular the original article may have been.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for helping pass this along!<BR/><BR/>-Jfarberboyhowdyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09799915352726835586noreply@blogger.com